Intel Corp. introduced its latest Itanium microprocessor code-named “Poulson” back in 2012 and since then the company has neither updated the lineup of its IA64 chips, nor revealed exact plans about future Itanium products. But while Intel has been consistently adding new reliability, availability and serviceability features to its Xeon E7 processors, making them suitable for mission-critical systems, the company is still committed to release new Itanium products.
“Intel remains committed to the Intel Itanium product line and to the delivery of the next-generation Intel Itanium processor, code named ‘Kittson’,” said Anna Cheng, a spokeswoman for Intel.
“Kittson will be manufactured on Intel’s 32nm process technology and will be socket compatible with the existing Itanium 9300/9500 platforms, providing customers with performance improvements, investment protection, and a seamless upgrade path for existing systems.”
Back in 2012, when the Itanium 9500 “Poulson” was released, Intel still had multiple partners, who used IA64 chips, including Bull, Hitachi, Hewlett-Packard, Inspur, Huawei and NEC. As a result, the company had a roadmap for future processors, including the code-named “Kittson” chip made using 22nm fabrication process.
Around the time, Intel started to add RAS capabilities to its Xeon E7 processors based on the industry-standard x86 architecture. As a result, Bull, Hitachi and NEC decided to switch to Xeon chips and HP remained the only partner with more or less significant volume requirements for Itanium CPUs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db382/db382a4224291376ab827a6215e757bbd13ac4e5" alt=""
Since demand for Itanium central processing units dropped significantly in 2012, Intel reconsidered its Itanium roadmap. Instead of using its 22nm technology to make “Kittson” products, the world’s largest microprocessor supplier decided to continue using the 32nm node for the CPU. Moreover, the company does not want to talk about innovations the “Kittson” products will bring.
thnx....http://www.kitguru.net/ for infos.
No comments:
Post a Comment